Collaboration is critical to innovating successfully. Working within any sector no two employees are the same, each has a unique set of skills and knowledge. Whether it be skill with understanding physical mechanisms and designing complex experiments or in-depth knowledge about a supply chains. A company’s greatest asset is the knowledge lying within its employees. Monetizing this growing and diverse knowledge base can occur faster and more complete by connecting all of this knowledge.
Connecting the knowledge that lies within the heads of our employees can occur easiest through collaboration.
According to Miriam Webster the definition of collaboration is:
Imagine what we could do together if it did not matter who got the credit.
- Design and enforce a corporate-wide fair distribution of credit, being mindful and cautions of the type of people who you are promoting, don’t allow credit stealing, don’t allow champions at politicking to dominate the culture, remember we get more of what we promote, for the good or for the bad. Promote collaborators, promote teachers, promote maturity in your workforce not extreme loyalty.
- Employ social collaboration tools, software for social collaboration is growing rapidly, these tools will only become more widespread and I believe should be adopted as soon as possible.
- Build an indexed storehouse of corporate knowledge of summarized reports and IP. Knowledge management and access is critical to minimize re-learning, parallel learning and total loss of learnings to email and overworked managers.
What else hinders collaboration within organizations?
I think there are three pillars to healthy innovation within a company or university.
- Teaching
- Collaboration
- Organizational Health
In this post I’d like to discuss teaching, I’ll touch on the others in later posts.
Have you ever encountered scientists or engineers who refuse to change their innovation habits? They seem to know everything, they ridicule most efforts at managing innovation and are almost impossible to influence.
I’ve acted this way myself, scoffing at attempts to manage innovation, telling managers and the like to just leave me alone, I’ll figure it out and send you a report. There is value in just leaving a good innovator alone but that is just one tool of many in innovation management.
The accumulation of knowledge tends to increase ego, if you’ve spent a lot of time around certain University professors it is not hard to see this:
1 Corinthians 8:1 … knowledge puffs up …
Valuable R&D professionals discover, accumulate and manage knowledge very efficiently.
We need to lead our innovative teams in a way that will both cause our most innovative R&D pros to collaborate together and in a way that does not trigger anger and resistance.
I am convinced that there is a win-win if we can encourage our scientists to teach. If we can get our R&D professionals to teach one another, teach leadership, and document learning’s with a motive of teaching this will trigger collaboration, sharing of knowledge, and a feeling of being engaged, (which will speed up innovation long-term). The great thing about teaching is that it appeals to intellectual ego that can cause us to be uncooperative at times.
What are other tips at getting R&D professionals to collaborate?